<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unload Cached Files?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogwindowsxp.com/unload-cached-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogwindowsxp.com/unload-cached-files/</link>
	<description>Windows XP Tips help you mod your pc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:54:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Miller</title>
		<link>http://blogwindowsxp.com/unload-cached-files/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwindowsxp.com/?p=12#comment-7</guid>
		<description>BAD IDEA
It is true, Windows does not immediately unload unneeded DLL&#039;s. And yes, this can be a waste of memory. But when a DLL is unloaded the memory is free, doing absolutely nothing. Is this not the ultimate in wasted memory?

Windows is quite capable of reclaiming the space used by unneeded DLL&#039;s when needed. Until that time comes, leave them in memory. Many applications use the same DLL&#039;s.

Windows designers know more about memory management then you do. Windows performs best without amateurish tinkering like this.

This setting was intended as an aid to software developers, never as a means of improving performance.

Larry Miller
Microsoft MCSA, Network+, A+, Amateur programmer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAD IDEA<br />
It is true, Windows does not immediately unload unneeded DLL&#8217;s. And yes, this can be a waste of memory. But when a DLL is unloaded the memory is free, doing absolutely nothing. Is this not the ultimate in wasted memory?</p>
<p>Windows is quite capable of reclaiming the space used by unneeded DLL&#8217;s when needed. Until that time comes, leave them in memory. Many applications use the same DLL&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Windows designers know more about memory management then you do. Windows performs best without amateurish tinkering like this.</p>
<p>This setting was intended as an aid to software developers, never as a means of improving performance.</p>
<p>Larry Miller<br />
Microsoft MCSA, Network+, A+, Amateur programmer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

